The cost per hire formula, with a full year worked line by line
On this page
The cost per hire formula is (total external recruiting costs + total internal recruiting costs) ÷ total hires, all for the same period. That structure is the one set out in the ANSI/SHRM Cost-per-Hire Standard (ANSI/SHRM 06001.2012), and it is the version finance teams tend to recognize. The arithmetic is simple. The work is in deciding which costs belong in each bucket and collecting them the same way every year.
This page lists what usually goes into each bucket, works a full year line by line on invented figures, shows cost per hire by source, and explains why the headline number can fall while nothing improves. For planning next year's spend rather than measuring last year's, see the recruiting budget template.
The formula
Cost per hire = (external costs + internal costs) ÷ total hires
External costs: money paid to outside parties for recruiting
Internal costs: the cost of your own people and systems doing recruiting
Total hires: hires who started (or accepted) in the same period
Use one period, usually a fiscal year, for all three parts. Costs from the calendar year divided by hires from the fiscal year produce a number nobody can reconcile.
What goes in each bucket
| External costs | Internal costs |
|---|---|
| Agency and search fees | Recruiter and sourcer pay and benefits, prorated to recruiting time |
| Job board and job advertising spend | Recruiting coordinator pay and benefits, prorated |
| Background checks, drug tests, assessments | Applicant tracking system and sourcing tools |
| Recruiting events and job fairs | Employee referral bonuses |
| Candidate travel for interviews | Recruiting team's travel |
| Relocation paid to new hires | A share of the TA leader's pay, if they manage recruiting |
| Sign-on bonuses (if you choose to include them) | Interviewer time (optional; see below) |
Some items can sit in either bucket depending on how your organization books them. Referral bonuses are paid to employees, so many teams list them as internal; sign-on bonuses go to the candidate, so they are often external. The bucket matters less than the consistency: decide once, list the decision, and keep it.
Interviewer time is the cost most teams leave out, because it is real but not invoiced. If you include it, put it on its own line so the figure can be compared with years when it was not counted. The interview-to-hire ratio page shows how to estimate interviewer hours per hire.
Leave out costs that begin after the hire starts: onboarding, training, equipment and salary. They are part of the cost of a new employee, not the cost of hiring one, and they are driven by other teams.
Worked example: one year, line by line
An invented company made 40 hires in its fiscal year, two of them through an agency.
| External cost | Basis | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Agency fees | 2 hires at 20% of a $135,000 salary = $27,000 each | $54,000 |
| Job boards and advertising | Annual contracts and sponsored posts | $18,000 |
| Background checks | 40 checks at $60 | $2,400 |
| Skills assessments | Annual licence | $3,600 |
| Recruiting events | Two campus fairs | $4,000 |
| Candidate interview travel | Final rounds for out-of-town candidates | $6,500 |
| Relocation | Three relocated hires | $15,000 |
| Total external | $103,500 | |
| Internal cost | Basis | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Recruiters | 2 recruiters, $95,000 each including benefits, 100% on recruiting | $190,000 |
| Recruiting coordinator | $70,000 including benefits, 50% on recruiting | $35,000 |
| ATS and sourcing tools | Annual subscriptions | $22,000 |
| Referral bonuses | 8 referral hires at $2,000 | $16,000 |
| Total internal | $263,000 | |
Cost per hire = ($103,500 + $263,000) ÷ 40 = $366,500 ÷ 40 = $9,162.50.
Internal costs are 72% of the total ($263,000 ÷ $366,500). If the team had left them out, cost per hire would read $103,500 ÷ 40 = $2,587.50, less than a third of the real figure.
That last line is the most common error in practice. A cost per hire built from external invoices alone makes an internal team look inexpensive next to agencies, when the salaries of the people doing the work are the largest single cost.
Cost per hire by source
The company-wide figure averages very different channels. Split it where the costs can be traced, and allocate the shared costs in a way you state.
| Source | Hires | Directly traceable cost | Direct cost per hire |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agency | 2 | $54,000 fees | $27,000 |
| Employee referral | 8 | $16,000 bonuses | $2,000 |
| Job boards and advertising | 18 | $18,000 spend | $1,000 |
| Careers page and recruiter sourcing | 12 | None directly traceable | $0 |
Direct costs alone understate every channel, because recruiter time, the ATS and background checks serve all of them. A simple allocation spreads the $278,500 of shared cost (everything except agency fees, referral bonuses and job boards) evenly across all 40 hires: $6,962.50 each. The agency hires then cost about $33,960 each and referral hires about $8,960. The even split is a simplification, since recruiters spend less time on an agency hire than on one they source themselves, but it is stated, repeatable and good enough to compare channels year on year. Tracking the source of every hire reliably is its own task; see source of hire tracking.
Why a falling cost per hire can mislead
Most recruiting cost is fixed in the short run. Salaries and software cost the same whether the team makes 30 hires or 50. Divide the same $366,500 by 50 hires instead of 40 and cost per hire drops to $7,330, without any change in how well the team recruits.
- Volume swings. Always report total spend and hires next to the ratio.
- Cheaper channels, weaker hires. Shifting from agencies to job boards cuts cost per hire, but if those hires leave sooner the saving disappears. Read cost per hire next to first-year attrition by source.
- Cost moved, not saved. Moving a coordinator's salary into another department's budget lowers the figure on paper and changes nothing.
- Hard roles deferred. A year with fewer senior or specialist hires will look cheaper. Split cost per hire by level where the numbers allow.
Benchmarks, and why to be careful with them
SHRM publishes cost-per-hire figures in its benchmarking research, and many articles quote a single national average from it. Before comparing, check which year the figure comes from, whether it is a mean or a median, whether executive hires are included, and which cost lines the participating organizations counted. A benchmark built with different inclusions is not comparable to yours, and full reports are often available only to members. The most useful comparison is your own figure, calculated the same way, year on year and by role level.
How to report it
COST PER HIRE, FY2026
Method: (external + internal recruiting costs) ÷ hires started in FY.
Internal includes prorated TA pay and benefits, ATS, referral bonuses.
Excludes onboarding, training, equipment and interviewer time.
External costs $103,500
Internal costs $263,000
Total $366,500
Hires 40
Cost per hire $9,163 (FY2025: $10,900 on 30 hires)
By source (direct + even share of $278,500 shared cost):
Agency $33,963 · Referral $8,963 · Job boards $7,963 · Direct $6,963
Note: the fall vs FY2025 is volume, not efficiency. Total spend rose
12% ($327,000 to $366,500); hires rose 33% (30 to 40).
The final note line does the most work. It stops a lower number being read as an efficiency gain when the real story is more hires on a larger budget.
Common mistakes
| Mistake | Effect | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| External costs only | Figure understated, often by more than half | Include prorated TA salaries and tools |
| Costs and hires from different periods | A number nobody can reconcile | One period for everything |
| Onboarding and training included one year, not the next | Trend breaks | Exclude, or report as a separate line |
| Internal transfers counted as hires | Cost per hire understated | Count external hires, or report internal moves separately |
| Reported without spend and volume | More hires look like efficiency | Always show total spend and hires |
| Used alone to judge channels | Cheap channels win even when hires leave | Pair with retention and quality by source |
Questions people ask
What is the standard cost per hire formula?
Add total external recruiting costs to total internal recruiting costs for a period and divide by the number of hires made in that period. This is the structure of the ANSI/SHRM Cost-per-Hire Standard (ANSI/SHRM 06001.2012), and using it makes your number easier to explain and compare over time.
Should recruiter salaries be included in cost per hire?
Yes. Recruiter and coordinator pay and benefits are usually the largest internal cost, and leaving them out makes an in-house team look far cheaper than an agency when it may not be. Prorate by the share of each person's time spent on recruiting.
Does cost per hire include onboarding and training?
Most teams keep onboarding, training and equipment out of cost per hire, because those costs are incurred after the hire is made and are driven by other teams. Track them separately if you need a total cost of bringing someone in.
Why did our cost per hire fall when we did not change anything?
Probably because you made more hires. A large share of recruiting cost is fixed, such as salaries and software, so the same spend divided by more hires gives a lower figure. Report total spend and hires next to the ratio so a volume change is not mistaken for efficiency.