Consent and compliance

E-Verify requirements in North Dakota: no mandate, a 5-88 House vote in 2023, and Montana's law across the oil patch

On this page
  1. North Dakota by employer type
  2. The 2023 vote
  3. The 2011 study resolution
  4. Across the borders
  5. Federal work, federal leases and tribal governments
  6. Form I-9 on rotational schedules
  7. Staffing agencies in the oil patch
  8. A worked example
  9. A North Dakota checklist
  10. Questions people ask

As of October 2026, North Dakota does not require any employer to use E-Verify. The Legislature has looked at the question twice in a meaningful way. In 2011 it asked for a study. In 2023 a bill to require E-Verify of every public and private employer in the state reached the House floor and lost 5 to 88.

The practical risk for North Dakota employers sits next door. Oil field service companies, pipeline contractors and staffing firms in Williston, Watford City and Dickinson routinely send crews into eastern Montana, where a 2025 state law now audits how employers verify work authorization. In the Red River Valley, Fargo and Grand Forks companies bid on Minnesota public work that carries its own verification certification.

Not legal advice. Checked as of October 2026. We downloaded all 2,532 chapter files of the North Dakota Century Code from the Legislative Branch site and searched them for "E-Verify," with no results; reviewed the bill history of HB 1527 (2023) and its sponsor's committee testimony; and read the enrolled text of HCR 3045 (2011). We did not review every bill of the 2025 session or local and agency contract terms. Confirm with counsel before relying on this.

North Dakota by employer type

EmployerState E-Verify ruleWhat applies instead
Private employers, including energy and agricultureNoneForm I-9 for every hire
State agencies, counties, cities, school districtsNone in the Century CodeForm I-9; voluntary enrollment is possible
Contractors on state and local public workNone in the Century CodeThe specific contract's terms
Federal contractors and subcontractorsFederal ruleFAR 52.222-54 where the contract includes it

The 2023 vote

House Bill 1527, sponsored by Representative Matt Heilman of Bismarck, would have created a new Century Code chapter "related to illegal aliens and private employment" with a penalty. In his testimony to the House Industry, Business and Labor Committee on February 6, 2023, the sponsor described it as mandating that all employers, public and private, use E-Verify. The bill moved quickly and ended quickly:

Date (2023)Action
January 18Introduced and referred to Political Subdivisions
January 20Re-referred to Industry, Business and Labor
February 6Committee hearing
February 7Reported back with a "do not pass" recommendation, 13-0 with one absent
February 9Failed on second reading in the House, 5 yeas and 88 nays

A unanimous committee and an 88-vote floor majority against suggests the issue is not close in Bismarck, at least for a mandate that reaches every private employer. That makes North Dakota different from South Dakota, where a narrower 2026 bill passed both chambers in some form before dying in conference.

The 2011 study resolution

House Concurrent Resolution 3045, sponsored by Representative Mock and Senator Grindberg, reached enrolled form in the 2011 session. It directed Legislative Management to study "the feasibility and desirability of requiring private or public employers or both to use the federal E-Verify program for new hires" and to report recommendations to the 2013 Legislative Assembly. Whatever that review concluded, no mandate followed, and the Century Code remains silent on E-Verify fifteen years later.

Across the borders

NeighborRuleWho in North Dakota should care
MontanaNo E-Verify mandate, but since July 1, 2025 every employer must keep an E-Verify confirmation or a completed Form I-9 with document copies, subject to state audits and per-worker finesOil field, pipeline and construction crews working in Sidney, Glendive or elsewhere in eastern Montana
MinnesotaVendors and subcontractors on state contracts for services over $50,000 certify they have implemented, or are implementing, E-Verify for new hires who will work for the state (Minn. Stat. 16C.075)Fargo and Grand Forks firms bidding Minnesota state work
South DakotaNo mandate; 2026's HB 1209 died in conferenceNobody, for now

Montana is the one to plan for. Its law is built around the employer's Montana workforce and nothing in it exempts an out-of-state employer, so treat employees working in Montana as covered unless counsel advises otherwise. The state can demand records on three business days' notice. A North Dakota company that sends a crew across the line should decide, in writing, whether those employees will be covered by E-Verify or by an I-9 with copied documents, and keep the files where they can be produced quickly.

Federal work, federal leases and tribal governments

Air force bases, federal buildings and federally procured construction carry FAR 52.222-54 when the contract exceeds $150,000, lasts 120 days or more and includes work in the United States, unless it is only for commercially available off-the-shelf items; the clause flows down to services and construction subcontracts over $3,500. A private contractor that accepts the clause enrolls within 30 days and generally verifies every new hire company-wide for the life of the contract.

Two distinctions matter in North Dakota. First, the clause belongs to procurement contracts. A lease of federal minerals, or a contract with a private operator that happens to hold federal leases, does not bring it in by itself; look for the clause in the documents you actually sign. Second, tribal governments in the state that hold a covered federal contract may choose under paragraph (b)(3) of the clause to verify only employees assigned to that contract.

Form I-9 on rotational schedules

With no state mandate, Form I-9 carries the whole compliance load for most North Dakota employers, and rotation schedules are where it slips. A few federal timing rules are worth restating for crews that work 14 days on and 14 off, or that start at a remote location:

  • Section 1 is due by the end of the first day of work for pay, and Section 2 by the end of the third business day after that day. Business days run on the calendar, not on the rotation, so a worker who starts on a Thursday and then goes off-hitch still needs Section 2 by the following Tuesday.
  • A worker who leaves and is rehired within three years of the original form can often be handled by updating the existing I-9 rather than completing a new one; see I-9 for rehires.
  • An employee who stays on the payroll between hitches is a continuing employee and does not need a new form.
  • If the company enrolls in E-Verify, the case is due within the same three business days, and rehires follow the program's own rules.

Staffing agencies in the oil patch

  • North Dakota placements: Form I-9 only, unless a federal clause applies.
  • Montana placements: meet Montana's records rule for every worker employed there.
  • Minnesota state service contracts: expect the client to pass down the E-Verify certification.
  • Workers who rotate between states on the same assignment should have one clean I-9, completed on time, with a file that can satisfy Montana's auditors as well. Self-audit with the I-9 audit checklist.
  • Licensing is separate; see staffing agency license requirements in North Dakota.

A worked example

This is an invented example. A Williston well-services company employs 120 people, mostly in McKenzie and Williams counties, and runs two rigs in Richland County, Montana. It does not use E-Verify. For its Montana crews it adopts Montana's document-copy route: each Montana hire's List A, or List B and List C, documents are copied and filed with the Form I-9. It then wins a subcontract to rebuild a road at a federal installation, and the purchase order includes FAR 52.222-54. The company enrolls within 30 days, starts running every new hire through E-Verify, and from then on its Montana crew files carry an E-Verify confirmation as well, which also satisfies Montana's E-Verify route.

A North Dakota checklist

  1. North Dakota-only work and no federal clause: Form I-9; E-Verify optional.
  2. Any employees working in Montana: choose a LEGAL Act method and keep records audit-ready.
  3. Minnesota state service contracts over $50,000: expect the E-Verify certification.
  4. Federal procurement contracts and subcontracts: check for FAR 52.222-54; leases alone do not trigger it.
  5. Watch the 2027 session for any revival of an HB 1527-style bill.

Questions people ask

Is E-Verify required in North Dakota?

No. As of October 2026 the North Dakota Century Code contains no E-Verify requirement for private employers, public employers or public contractors. The most recent attempt, House Bill 1527 in 2023, would have required every public and private employer to use it; the House defeated it 5-88 on February 9, 2023.

Does Montana's LEGAL Act apply to a North Dakota company working in eastern Montana?

For employees working in Montana, it can. Montana's law, in effect since July 1, 2025, requires employers to keep either an E-Verify confirmation or a completed Form I-9 with copies of the supporting documents for each new employee, and lets the state audit and fine employers. It does not require E-Verify itself.

Does an oil and gas lease on federal land require E-Verify?

Not by itself. FAR 52.222-54 is a clause in federal procurement contracts and qualifying subcontracts. A lease of federal minerals is not a procurement contract, so it does not carry the clause on its own terms. Services bought directly by a federal agency, such as construction at a military base, are different and should be checked for the clause.

Did North Dakota ever study an E-Verify mandate?

Yes. House Concurrent Resolution 3045, enrolled in the 2011 session, directed Legislative Management to study whether public or private employers, or both, should be required to use E-Verify for new hires and to report to the 2013 Legislative Assembly. No mandate has been enacted since.