How to get interviewers to submit scorecards on time
On this page
Interviewers submit scorecards when the scorecard is short, due at a fixed time soon after the interview, visibly tracked, and required before anything else happens. In practice that means three to five focus attributes per interview, 15 minutes blocked on the interviewer's calendar straight after the interview, automatic reminders switched on, other interviewers' feedback hidden until they submit, and no debrief or candidate decision until every scorecard is in. Measure it as an on-time completion rate: scorecards submitted by your deadline divided by interviews held.
This page is the recruiter's playbook. If you are the interviewer, the how-to for one ATS is in how to fill out a Greenhouse scorecard from your notes or Lever interview notes and feedback.
How do you measure scorecard completion?
Track three numbers per month, overall and per interviewer:
| Metric | Formula | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| On-time completion rate | Scorecards submitted within your deadline ÷ interviews held | Whether feedback arrives in time to be useful |
| Median time to submit | Middle value of (submitted time − interview end time) | How far from the deadline the typical interviewer is |
| Thin scorecard rate | Scorecards with no written evidence ÷ scorecards submitted | Whether completion is real or a rating with nothing behind it |
Use interviews held as the denominator, not scorecards assigned. If interviews happen without a scorecard ever being created (a manager's informal coffee, a screen booked outside the ATS), a rate based on assigned scorecards looks better than reality. As a worked example with invented numbers: 120 interviews held in a month, 84 scorecards submitted within one business day and 101 in total gives an on-time rate of 70% and an overall rate of 84%. The 16-point gap is the feedback that arrived too late to shape a decision.
What does the published data say?
Two sources with real data behind them, both from vendors, so read them as indications rather than benchmarks:
- Most interviews never get a scorecard. Metaview, which sells AI interview notes, analyzed 5.2 million candidate interviews captured on its platform and found that 31.2% had a scorecard attached. Of the scorecards that were created, 32% were complete and 26% blank. Interviewers submitted 28.6% of scorecards they started from scratch and 50.3% of those Metaview had drafted from the conversation; the author calls this an observational comparison, not a controlled experiment (Metaview, "What 5.2M interviews reveal about scorecard completion", June 2026).
- Fewer attributes make scorecards comparable. In an analysis of about 10.3 million scorecards from jobs created in 2022, Greenhouse estimated that comparability between interviewers was 31 to 38 percent higher when the interview used focus attributes, and suggested three to five per interview (Greenhouse, "How Focus Attributes improve comparability of interview scorecards").
Greenhouse's own tips for improving scorecard submission rate (February 2026) point the same way: no more than five focus attributes per interview, required key takeaways, a service level agreement with hiring managers, reminder emails shortly after each interview, and its interviewer engagement report to see who is slowing the process.
Why do interviewers skip scorecards?
- The form is too long. Ten attributes for a 45-minute interview means half of them have no evidence, and an interviewer who cannot fill a form honestly puts it off.
- They have nothing to write from. No notes during the interview means writing from memory, which is slow and uncomfortable, so it waits.
- Nothing happens if they don't. If the debrief goes ahead and the decision gets made anyway, the scorecard was optional in practice.
- The next meeting starts immediately. The interview ends at 2:00, the next meeting starts at 2:00, and by 5:00 the scorecard is tomorrow's problem.
- They never hear what happened. Interviewers who never learn whether their feedback mattered stop investing in it.
Which ATS settings help?
Greenhouse, from its support articles as of October 2026:
- Every interviewer automatically gets a "Scorecard due" email one hour after the interview's scheduled end, re-sent once a day for up to 10 business days or until submitted. The default cannot be switched off or edited, per Configure a scorecard reminder notification.
- Under Job Setup, Notifications, Scorecard Reminders, a Job Admin can set a custom schedule: first reminder 1 hour or 3 hours after the interview, or at end of day (6 p.m. in the interviewer's time zone), with follow-ups daily or every 2 or 3 days, and rules for when to stop. A toggle sends reminders through Slack as well, for interviewers who have the Slack integration.
- A recruiter can send a reminder manually from the candidate's profile: the job's Stage section, expand the stage, Send Reminder.
- Scorecards are required for each interview by default; the Scorecards FAQ shows where the "Requires scorecards to be submitted" box sits in the interview plan. Leave it on.
Lever, from its help center as of October 2026:
- Interviewers get an automated reminder email with a Complete Feedback button; they can dismiss it with Stop reminders or "I didn't attend this interview", per Lever's interviewer guide. Check dismissals: a dismissed form can only be recovered from the calendar event or the original email.
- The feedback visibility setting "Also hide feedback from the interview panel until they've submitted feedback" means interviewers cannot read the others' views until they have submitted their own. That protects independent judgment and gives a reason to submit.
Agency recruiters chasing client interviewers have no scorecard to configure; the equivalent is a feedback deadline agreed at intake and a sequence of follow-ups, covered in our client feedback request emails.
What is the playbook, step by step?
- Agree the deadline at kickoff. "Scorecards by end of the same business day, and before any debrief" goes in the role's kickoff notes alongside the must-haves.
- Cut each interview to three to five focus attributes. One interview cannot gather good evidence on more, and a form that can be filled honestly gets filled.
- Block the time. When you schedule an interview, add a 15-minute "scorecard" hold straight after it on the interviewer's calendar.
- Switch on reminders and add Slack where you can. The first reminder should land while the interview is still fresh.
- Hide feedback until submitted. In Greenhouse set interviewers' scorecard visibility to "Never" or until all have submitted; in Lever tick the hide-until-submitted box.
- No scorecard, no debrief. If one is missing, the debrief moves. Do it once and the team believes the rule. Our interview debrief template sets scorecards due before the meeting and records who was late.
- Report monthly by interviewer. On-time rate and median time to submit, sent to each interviewer's leader, framed as hiring speed, not blame.
- Close the loop. Tell interviewers the outcome and, when their evidence decided it, say so.
- Remove the blank page. Interviewers who take notes during the interview submit faster; see how to take interview notes as a hiring manager.
What should a scorecard reminder say?
Short, specific, and with the link. Three messages for the recruiter to send in their own name:
Same day, 4 p.m.:
Hi [name], could you submit your scorecard for [candidate] today?
The debrief is [day] and we need yours before then. [link]
Next morning:
Hi [name], yours is the last scorecard outstanding for [candidate].
Five minutes on the [focus attributes] would let us move.
If you didn't get enough evidence on one, just say so in the form.
Day two, to the interviewer, copying the hiring manager:
[candidate] is waiting on a decision and [competitor offer / their
notice] means we have until [date]. Can you submit by noon?
If something is blocking you, tell me and I'll help.
The line "if you didn't get enough evidence, say so" matters: some interviewers delay because they feel they must rate everything. A blank attribute with an honest comment is better than no scorecard.
Should AI draft the scorecard to raise completion?
Drafts remove the blank page, and Metaview's data above suggests drafted scorecards are submitted more often, though it could not separate the draft's effect from the habits of teams that use drafts. Three guardrails keep a higher completion rate from becoming a lower-quality one:
- The interviewer rates. A draft can fill evidence fields; the attribute ratings and the overall recommendation come from the person who ran the interview. Greenhouse Notetaker, for example, reminds interviewers when generated notes are submitted without their own Key Takeaways.
- Quotes are checked. Every quote in a scorecard should exist in the transcript. Some tools check this automatically (Interview Signal removes any scorecard quote it cannot find in the transcript); with others, the interviewer must.
- Thin rate stays on the dashboard. If completion rises and the share of scorecards with real evidence falls, the drafts are being rubber-stamped.
Questions people ask
What is a good interview scorecard completion rate?
There is no reliable cross-company benchmark to aim at. The largest published dataset, Metaview's June 2026 analysis of its own platform, found only 31.2% of 5.2 million candidate interviews had any scorecard attached. A workable internal target is every scorecard submitted before the debrief and within one business day, measured as on-time scorecards divided by interviews held.
How do I get hiring managers to fill out interview scorecards?
Make the scorecard short (three to five focus attributes), agree a deadline at the role kickoff, block 15 minutes after each interview on their calendar, switch on automatic reminders, hide other interviewers' feedback until they submit, and do not hold the debrief or move the candidate until every scorecard is in. Report completion by interviewer each month to their leader.
Does Greenhouse send scorecard reminders automatically?
Yes. As of October 2026, Greenhouse's support article says every interviewer gets a Scorecard due email one hour after the scheduled end of the interview, repeated daily for up to 10 business days or until the scorecard is submitted. Job Admins can set a custom schedule, add Slack reminders, and recruiters can send a reminder manually from the candidate's profile.
Do AI-drafted scorecards improve completion rates?
They appear to help. Metaview reported that interviewers submitted 50.3% of scorecards it had drafted from the conversation against 28.6% of those written from scratch, but that was an observational comparison by a vendor of drafting software, not a controlled experiment. If you use drafts, keep the rating and the summary judgment with the interviewer.