New Hampshire pay transparency law: no range rule, but Massachusetts, Vermont and Maine all have one (2026)
On this page
- Does New Hampshire require salary ranges in job postings?
- What would HB 1123 have required?
- What does New Hampshire law already require about pay?
- Which neighboring states' laws reach a New Hampshire job?
- How should a New Hampshire employer handle a Massachusetts or Vermont role?
- Can a New Hampshire city require pay ranges?
- Do federal rules require pay ranges?
- What should New Hampshire recruiters and staffing agencies do?
- New Hampshire at a glance
- Questions people ask
New Hampshire has no law that requires employers to put a pay range in job postings, as of November 2026. The 2026 attempt, House Bill 1123, would have required employers with 50 or more employees in the state to post a starting salary range and a description of benefits; the House voted it inexpedient to legislate, 193 to 149, on February 5, 2026. What New Hampshire does have is a ban on pay secrecy rules (RSA 275:41-b), a duty to tell new hires their rate of pay (RSA 275:49) and an equal pay law (RSA 275:37). Unlike most states without a posting law, New Hampshire is surrounded by states that have one: Massachusetts, Vermont and Maine all require ranges, and New Hampshire employers recruit in all three.
This is not legal advice. The New Hampshire statutes and the HB 1123 record were read on the General Court's site as of November 2026, and the Massachusetts, Vermont, Maine and federal sources are linked where they are used. Confirm your situation with a lawyer licensed in New Hampshire and in any neighboring state your posting reaches.
Does New Hampshire require salary ranges in job postings?
No. RSA chapter 275, New Hampshire's protective labor chapter, governs what an employer tells people it has already hired, not what it advertises. A Manchester, Nashua or Portsmouth employer can post without a range under state law. The rest of New Hampshire's hiring rules, including the annulled-record question format for criminal history, are in our guide to hiring employees in New Hampshire.
What would HB 1123 have required?
HB 1123, "requiring certain companies to post expected salary ranges on public job listings," was sponsored by Representative Alice Wade with Representatives Heath Howard, Valerie McDonnell and Billie Butler and Senator David Watters. The introduced text would have added RSA 275:70-b:
- Who: an employer "that employs 50 or more employees at one or more sites in New Hampshire," including the state, counties, towns, cities and school districts.
- What: "a starting salary range and a general description of all benefits and other compensation, including any health or retirement benefits," in each posting for each job opening.
- Postings: any solicitation to recruit applicants for a specific position, "including recruitment done directly by an employer or indirectly through a third party," electronic or printed.
- Ranges: a good-faith minimum and maximum; an employer not planning to negotiate "shall list a fixed pay rate," and "a salary range shall not be open ended."
The bill record shows it was introduced on January 7, 2026 and referred to the House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services Committee, which held a hearing on January 13. On January 20 the committee majority recommended inexpedient to legislate by a 10 to 9 roll call, with a minority report of ought to pass. The House adopted the majority report 193 to 149 on February 5, 2026. It was the only 2025 or 2026 bill we found that would have required ranges.
What does New Hampshire law already require about pay?
| Statute | What it requires | What it means in hiring |
|---|---|---|
| RSA 275:49 | Every employer must "notify the employees, at the time of hiring of the rate of pay, and of the day and place of payment," make its vacation, sick leave and fringe benefit policies available in writing or by posted notice, and post the equal pay notice | The offer or first-day paperwork must state the rate of pay; it is a duty to the new hire, not a posting duty |
| RSA 275:41-b | No employer may require, as a condition of employment, that an employee "refrain from disclosing the amount of his or her wages," or sign a waiver of that right; no discharge, formal discipline or other discrimination for disclosing wages, salary or paid benefits | Pay-confidentiality clauses in offer letters and handbooks are unlawful |
| RSA 275:37 | "No employer or person seeking employees" may pay one sex less than the other for equal work requiring equal skill, effort and responsibility under similar working conditions, except under a seniority system, a merit or performance-based system, a production-based system, expertise, shift differentials, or "a demonstrable factor other than sex, such as education, training, or experience" | Write down the factor behind each offer; the statute's own list is the vocabulary to use |
Note the words "person seeking employees" in RSA 275:37: the equal pay rule is written to reach those recruiting, not only those already employing. The federal Equal Pay Act adds a claim against virtually all employers, and the NLRB treats "talking with one or more co-workers about your wages and benefits or other working conditions" as protected concerted activity for most private-sector employees.
Which neighboring states' laws reach a New Hampshire job?
All three of New Hampshire's state neighbors now require pay ranges, with different thresholds and tests:
| State | Employers covered | What the posting needs | Which jobs | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | 25 or more employees in the commonwealth; the Attorney General counts employees whose primary place of work is Massachusetts in the prior calendar year | The pay range for the position; the range also on request to an applicant or current holder of the position, and to an employee offered a promotion or transfer | Positions whose primary place of work is Massachusetts, including remote roles tied to a Massachusetts worksite | G.L. c. 149, § 105F; AG FAQ |
| Vermont | 5 or more employees, with at least one person working in Vermont | The compensation or range of compensation in any advertisement, in force since July 1, 2025 | Jobs physically located in Vermont, or remote jobs that will predominantly work for an office or work location in Vermont | 21 V.S.A. § 495p |
| Maine | 10 or more employees | "The prospective range of pay the employer will offer to a successful applicant," or a statement that pay is solely commission | The statute does not say how it applies to remote jobs or to employers outside Maine | 26 M.R.S. § 622-A |
Each state's details, including penalties, are in our Massachusetts guide, Vermont guide and Maine guide. For fully remote roles open to candidates across the country, see pay transparency for remote jobs.
How should a New Hampshire employer handle a Massachusetts or Vermont role?
Massachusetts. The question is where the job's primary place of work is, not where the employer is headquartered. A Salem, New Hampshire company that has 25 or more employees working primarily in Massachusetts and posts a Lowell or Boston role needs the range. Under the Attorney General's primary-place-of-work test, the same company posting a role based at its Salem office is outside section 105F for that posting, even if the hire lives in Massachusetts. Section 105F also treats one or more postings made by the same employer within a 48-hour period as a single offense for enforcement.
Vermont. Section 495p covers a job "physically located in Vermont" or a remote job that will "predominantly perform work for an office or work location that is physically located in Vermont," and excludes a job physically located outside Vermont that works predominantly for offices outside Vermont. Section 495d defines an employer as one with "one or more individuals performing services for it within this State," and section 495p adds a five-employee threshold, so a Lebanon employer that already has staff working in Vermont is covered when it advertises a White River Junction job. The statute does not say how it treats a remote employee who lives in Vermont but works for a New Hampshire office, so ask counsel or include the range. Verbal announcements, including radio, are not "advertisements" under the section.
Maine. Section 622-A applies to employers with 10 or more employees but does not say whether they must be in Maine. A Seacoast employer recruiting for a site in Kittery or York should assume it is covered.
Can a New Hampshire city require pay ranges?
We found no New Hampshire city or town ordinance that requires private employers to post pay ranges, as of November 2026. Any New Hampshire pay range rule for private employers would most likely come from the General Court, as HB 1123 tried to.
Do federal rules require pay ranges?
No. The federal contractor pay transparency rule, 41 CFR 60-1.35, only protected pay discussions, and it has been removed: Executive Order 14173 revoked Executive Order 11246 on January 21, 2025, and the Department of Labor's final rule rescinded the order's regulations, including part 60-1, effective October 26, 2026 (91 FR 54444). RSA 275:41-b still bars pay secrecy rules in New Hampshire, contractor or not. See job posting requirements for federal contractors.
What should New Hampshire recruiters and staffing agencies do?
- Tag every requisition with its primary place of work. New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont or Maine decides which rule applies, so make it a required field.
- Count employees by state. Know whether you have 25 or more working primarily in Massachusetts, 5 or more for Vermont and 10 or more overall for Maine.
- Consider one posting format for the region. New Hampshire does not require a range, but a two-ended range on every posting means a role that turns out to be Massachusetts-based is already compliant. See how to set salary ranges for job postings.
- Put the rate of pay in every offer letter to satisfy RSA 275:49, and strip pay-confidentiality language to satisfy RSA 275:41-b.
- Agencies: get the client's range and work location at intake. New Hampshire agency rules are in staffing agency licensing in New Hampshire; posting duties when you recruit for a client are in pay transparency for staffing agencies.
Example posting line (example figures): "Pay: $62,000 to $74,000 a year, based on experience. Benefits: medical, dental, 401(k) with match, 15 days PTO." That satisfies Massachusetts, Vermont and Maine for a covered employer and costs nothing in New Hampshire. For phrasing pay questions on the call, see salary expectation questions.
New Hampshire at a glance
| Item | The rule as of November 2026 | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Pay range in job postings | Not required | RSA chapter 275 |
| 2026 bill | HB 1123 (50 or more employees, starting range and benefits) killed 193 to 149 on February 5, 2026 | HB 1123 docket |
| Rate of pay at hire | Employer must tell each new employee the rate of pay and the day and place of payment | RSA 275:49 |
| Pay secrecy | Banned as a condition of employment; no retaliation for disclosing pay | RSA 275:41-b |
| Equal pay | No lower pay by sex for equal work; six listed defenses | RSA 275:37 |
| Massachusetts roles | Pay range in postings for covered employers (25 or more) | G.L. c. 149, § 105F |
| Vermont roles | Compensation or range in advertisements (5 or more employees) | 21 V.S.A. § 495p |
| Maine roles | Prospective range of pay in postings (10 or more employees) | 26 M.R.S. § 622-A |
| Federal contractor pay transparency rule | Removed effective October 26, 2026 | 91 FR 54444 |
More New Hampshire rules: ban the box in New Hampshire, New Hampshire background check laws, employer of record in New Hampshire and E-Verify in New Hampshire. For every state's rule, see pay transparency laws by state.
Questions people ask
Does New Hampshire require pay ranges in job postings?
No. As of November 2026 no New Hampshire statute requires a pay range in a job posting. RSA 275:49 does require every employer to tell a new employee the rate of pay at the time of hiring, but that is a notice to the person hired, not a posting rule.
What happened to New Hampshire's HB 1123?
The House killed it. HB 1123 of 2026 would have required employers with 50 or more employees in New Hampshire to include a starting salary range and a general description of benefits in each job posting. The Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services Committee recommended inexpedient to legislate by a 10 to 9 vote, and the House adopted that recommendation 193 to 149 on February 5, 2026.
Can a New Hampshire employer make employees keep their pay confidential?
No. RSA 275:41-b bars employers from requiring, as a condition of employment, that an employee refrain from disclosing the amount of his or her wages, or sign a waiver giving up that right, and bars discharging, formally disciplining or otherwise discriminating against an employee who discloses wages, salary or paid benefits.
Does Massachusetts's pay transparency law apply to New Hampshire employers?
It can. Massachusetts General Laws chapter 149, section 105F requires covered employers to disclose the pay range in postings, and the Massachusetts Attorney General's guidance applies it to employers with 25 or more employees whose primary place of work is Massachusetts and to positions whose primary place of work is Massachusetts. A Nashua company with 25 or more Massachusetts-based employees posting a Massachusetts-based role should include the range.