Wyoming salary history ban: no state law, the 2019 and 2021 bills that died, and Colorado's ban across the line
On this page
- Is it illegal to ask about salary history in Wyoming?
- What did the 2019 and 2021 bills propose?
- How does Wyoming's equal pay law treat prior pay?
- What does Riser v. QEP Energy mean for Wyoming offers?
- What can a former employer share in Wyoming?
- Do Wyoming cities have salary history rules?
- Does Colorado's ban reach Wyoming recruiters?
- Should a Wyoming recruiter ask about current pay?
- A Wyoming script
- Wyoming summary
- Wyoming checklist
- Questions people ask
Wyoming has no law that bars employers from asking job candidates about their salary history, as of November 2026. Two bills tried: HB0178, "Prospective employees-salary history," was postponed indefinitely on February 4, 2019, and SF0131, the "Workplace transparency act-2," died in committee in April 2021, according to the Legislative Service Office's records; the 2025 and 2026 sessions had none. What limits using pay history in Wyoming is the equal pay article, W.S. 27-4-302, and the Tenth Circuit's ruling in Riser v. QEP Energy that prior salary alone cannot justify a pay gap. For jobs across the southern border, Colorado's ban applies.
Not legal advice. This page summarizes Wyoming Statutes Title 27 as published by the Wyoming Legislature, the Legislature's records for HB0178 (2019), SF0131 (2021) and the 2025 and 2026 sessions, the Tenth Circuit's opinion in Riser v. QEP Energy and federal law, as of November 2026. Other states' laws apply to jobs located there. Consult Wyoming counsel for specific decisions.
Is it illegal to ask about salary history in Wyoming?
No. We searched the full text of Title 27, Labor and Employment, in November 2026 for "salary history," "wage history," "compensation history" and "pay history" and found nothing, and the Legislature's bill lists for the 2025 and 2026 sessions contain no bill on the subject. Our Wyoming pay transparency page reached the same result for pay ranges. Private and public employers may ask, and a candidate may decline.
That matches our guide to hiring employees in Wyoming and Wyoming background check laws.
What did the 2019 and 2021 bills propose?
Both would have added a new paragraph (v) to the list of unfair employment practices in W.S. 27-9-105(a).
- HB0178 (2019), sponsored by Representative Connolly and others, would have made it unfair for an employer to "Seek, orally or in writing, personally or through an agent, the salary history information of a prospective employee," or to rely on it in deciding whether to hire or what to pay, according to the introduced text. A candidate could still disclose salary history "voluntarily and without prompting," and the employer could then consider it. "Salary history information" would have included "compensation and benefits" but not information public under federal or state records laws. The House postponed it indefinitely on February 4, 2019.
- SF0131 (2021), sponsored by Senator Salazar and others, would have applied only to employers with 50 or more full-time employees and combined the salary history rule with protections for discussing wages, according to its introduced text. It died in Senate committee and was returned under the Senate's rules on April 7, 2021. A House bill with the shorter title, HB0196 (2021), the "Workplace transparency act," covered only wage disclosure, with no salary history rule, and died in House committee the same day.
Both drafts would have used the "agent" language that matters to recruiters. Neither became law, so a Wyoming agency can lawfully ask today; the question is whether it should.
How does Wyoming's equal pay law treat prior pay?
W.S. 27-4-302 follows the federal model. An employer may not pay employees less than "employees of the opposite gender for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort and responsibility and which are performed under similar working conditions," except under a seniority system, a merit system, a production system, or "A differential based on any other factor other than gender." Prior pay, if it is used, has to qualify under that last clause. Three features raise the stakes:
- The definition reaches agents. Under W.S. 27-4-301(b), "Employer" includes "any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee."
- Double recovery. W.S. 27-4-303 makes a violating employer liable for the unpaid wages "and in an additional equal amount as liquidated damages," and says no agreement to work for less is a defense. The state claim process through the Department of Workforce Services is covered on our pay transparency page.
- A criminal penalty. Under W.S. 27-4-304, an employer who "willfully violates" the article can be fined up to $500, jailed up to six months, or both.
The Fair Employment Practices Act adds a second claim. W.S. 27-9-102(b) covers the state, its subdivisions and every other person "employing two (2) or more employees within the state," other than religious organizations, and W.S. 27-9-105(a) bars discrimination "in matters of compensation" because of age, sex, race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry or pregnancy, or against a qualified disabled person, and bars discrimination by "a person, an employment agency, a labor organization."
What does Riser v. QEP Energy mean for Wyoming offers?
Wyoming is in the Tenth Circuit. In Riser v. QEP Energy, No. 14-4025, decided January 27, 2015, the court accepted that a former salary "can be considered in determining whether pay disparity is based on a factor other than sex," but held that the Equal Pay Act "precludes an employer from relying solely upon a prior salary to justify pay disparity." The EEOC's Compliance Manual section on compensation discrimination, on eeoc.gov as of November 2026, says the same: "Prior salary cannot, by itself, justify a compensation disparity." Because W.S. 27-4-302 uses the same "factor other than" wording as the federal Act, an offer that rests only on what the candidate used to earn is exposed under both. Our Utah page covers the case facts.
Two other federal points. Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a), bars compensation discrimination by employers with 15 or more employees. And the OFCCP pay transparency rule, 41 CFR 60-1.35, no longer applies to federal contractors: Executive Order 14173 revoked Executive Order 11246, and the Labor Department removed part 60-1 effective October 26, 2026 (91 FR 54444). The National Labor Relations Act still protects most private-sector employees who discuss their wages.
What can a former employer share in Wyoming?
W.S. 27-1-113 says an employer "who discloses information about a former employee's job performance to a prospective employer or to an employer of the former employee is presumed to be acting in good faith" and is immune from civil liability unless lack of good faith is shown by a preponderance of the evidence. The presumption is rebutted by showing the information was "knowingly false or deliberately misleading or was rendered with malicious purpose." The statute covers job performance; it does not mention pay, unlike North Dakota's (see the North Dakota page).
Do Wyoming cities have salary history rules?
We found none. In November 2026 we searched the Cheyenne, Casper and Laramie codes on Municode and the Rock Springs code on American Legal Publishing for "salary history," "wage history," "compensation history" and "pay history," with no results. We did not check Gillette's code for this page.
Does Colorado's ban reach Wyoming recruiters?
Yes, whenever the person will work in Colorado. Colorado's Equal Pay for Equal Work Act bars every employer with someone working in the state from asking about pay history or relying on it, with no size threshold; see the Colorado salary history ban. For Cheyenne and Laramie desks that recruit into Fort Collins, Greeley and Denver, that is the rule to plan around.
The other neighbors have no statewide ban: see Utah and South Dakota, and the full list in salary history ban states. Remote postings raise the matching pay range question, covered in pay transparency for remote jobs.
Should a Wyoming recruiter ask about current pay?
| Situation | The rule | Practical call |
|---|---|---|
| "What are you making now?" for a Wyoming job | Lawful | Ask for expectations instead |
| Same question for a Fort Collins job | Barred by Colorado's ban | Do not ask, from any source |
| Offer set to match prior pay | May be one factor; not enough alone under Riser | Anchor to the range and documented factors |
| Recruiter passes a volunteered figure to the client | "Employer" includes anyone acting in an employer's interest (27-4-301(b)) | Pass on expectations, not history |
| Reference call asking for salary | Not covered by the 27-1-113 presumption, which is about performance | Ask about dates, title and performance |
Agency licensing and other screening rules are in Wyoming staffing agency licensing and E-Verify requirements in Wyoming.
A Wyoming script
Opening the pay topic
"This role pays $64,000 to $74,000 plus benefits (example figures). What are you looking for?" More wording is in salary expectation questions.
When the hiring manager wants to match the candidate's old salary
"We can weigh it, but it can't be the only reason for the number. The Tenth Circuit said so in Riser. Let's tie the offer to the range and her experience, and write that down."
When a Colorado client asks what the candidate earns now
"For a Colorado job we can't ask or use that. Her expectation is $72,000."
Wyoming summary
| Item | The rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Salary history ban | No statute, for private or public employers | Title 27 text search; 2025 and 2026 bill lists |
| 2019 bill | HB0178 postponed indefinitely, February 4, 2019 | HB0178 |
| 2021 bill | SF0131 (50+ full-time employees) died in committee, April 7, 2021 | SF0131 |
| Equal pay | Equal work; seniority, merit, production or any other factor other than gender | W.S. 27-4-302 |
| Remedies | Unpaid wages plus equal liquidated damages; criminal penalty for willful violations | W.S. 27-4-303, 27-4-304 |
| Fair Employment Practices Act | Two or more employees; compensation; employment agencies | W.S. 27-9-102, 27-9-105 |
| References | Good-faith presumption for job performance disclosures | W.S. 27-1-113 |
| Prior pay as a defense | May be considered; cannot alone justify a gap | Riser v. QEP Energy (10th Cir. 2015) |
| Colorado jobs | Pay history barred for every employer with someone working there | Colorado Equal Pay for Equal Work Act |
Wyoming checklist
- Adopt a no-pay-history policy even though Wyoming allows the question.
- Share the range first and ask for expectations.
- Never let prior pay be the only reason for a pay difference; record the job-related reasons for each offer.
- Keep volunteered figures out of notes and submittals; see what not to write in interview notes.
- Keep reference requests to dates, title and performance.
- Treat every Colorado job under Colorado's ban.
Questions people ask
Can Wyoming employers ask about salary history?
Yes. As of November 2026, no Wyoming law bars private or public employers from asking job candidates about current or past pay. The two bills that would have barred it both failed: HB0178 was postponed indefinitely on February 4, 2019, and SF0131 died in committee in April 2021. No bill on the subject appears in the 2025 or 2026 sessions.
Can a Wyoming employer use my previous salary to set my pay?
It may consider it, but not as the only reason for a pay gap between men and women doing equal work. W.S. 27-4-302 allows a differential based on any other factor other than gender, and in Riser v. QEP Energy (2015), a Tenth Circuit decision that binds federal courts in Wyoming, the court said the federal Equal Pay Act precludes relying solely on prior salary to justify a pay disparity.
What can a former employer say about me in Wyoming?
W.S. 27-1-113 presumes good faith when an employer discloses information about a former employee's job performance to a prospective employer, and the presumption is rebutted if the information was knowingly false, deliberately misleading or given with malicious purpose. The statute does not mention pay.
Does Colorado's salary history ban apply to a Wyoming company?
If the person will work in Colorado, yes. Colorado bars every employer with someone working in the state from asking about pay history or relying on it, so a Cheyenne company or agency hiring for a Fort Collins or Denver role should not ask.