Background check policy template: checks by role, FCRA notices, adjudication and records
On this page
- What do you need to decide before writing the policy?
- The background check policy template
- Which law does each clause answer to?
- How do you use this template?
- How should adjudication work without becoming a blanket ban?
- Can you recheck current employees?
- What mistakes make a background check policy fail?
- Questions people ask
A background check policy is the company document that says which checks apply to which roles, when they run (usually after a conditional offer), how candidates are told and asked under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, how results are judged against the job, who decides, whether current staff are rechecked, and how reports are stored and destroyed. Below is a copy-ready template with [bracketed] fields, the choices to make before adopting it, a table of the federal rules behind each clause as of October 2026, and links to the state pages that change it.
This page is the policy. For the step-by-step paperwork on one hire, see the FCRA background check process, and for the emails that go to candidates, see background check notification emails.
Not legal advice. The federal rules below are summarized from the statute, the FTC and EEOC's joint employer guidance and EEOC enforcement guidance as published on the linked pages as of October 2026. State and city laws add timing rules, notices and assessment steps. Have counsel review the policy for every place you hire before you adopt it.
What do you need to decide before writing the policy?
| Decision | Options | A common default |
|---|---|---|
| Which checks for which roles | One package for everyone; packages by role family | By role family, so each check can be tied to the duties of the job |
| When checks start | After application; after final interview; after conditional offer | After a conditional offer, which is the earliest point fair chance laws such as California's allow for criminal history |
| Who sees the report | Hiring manager; HR; a named adjudicator | A trained adjudicator in HR, not interviewers |
| How results are judged | Case by case; written criteria per role family | Written criteria plus an individualized assessment before any adverse decision |
| Response window | Statute silent federally; set by state or city law in some places | At least five business days, or longer where local law requires |
| Current employees | Never; on transfer into a covered role; periodic | Only for role families where the risk continues, such as drivers or licensed roles |
| Retention | One year; longer by state; until a claim closes | At least one year from the decision, then secure destruction |
The background check policy template
Copy it into your own document and replace everything in square brackets.
BACKGROUND CHECK POLICY
[Organization] Version [x] Effective [date]
Owner: [name, role] Legal review: [date] Next review: [date]
1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE
1.1 This policy sets out when [Organization] obtains background
checks on applicants [, contractors] and employees, how they are
told and asked, how results are assessed, and how records are kept.
1.2 It applies to positions in [states / countries]. Where a state or
local law is stricter than this policy, that law applies
(Appendix B).
1.3 It covers reports from a consumer reporting agency ("screening
company"). Reference calls made by our own staff follow
[the reference check procedure].
2. CHECKS BY ROLE FAMILY
2.1 Only the checks listed for the role family in Appendix A are
ordered. No one may add a check for an individual candidate.
2.2 Every candidate for the same role receives the same checks.
2.3 [Credit reports are ordered only for the role families marked in
Appendix A, and only where state and local law allows.]
2.4 [We do not order investigative consumer reports or social media
screening.] OR [These are ordered only as listed in Appendix A.]
3. TIMING
3.1 Checks start only after a conditional offer of employment, and no
earlier than the law where the job is located allows.
3.2 Recruiters and interviewers do not ask about criminal history
before that point and do not search for it themselves.
3.3 The conditional offer states that it depends on [the background
check / the checks listed] and names any other conditions.
4. DISCLOSURE AND AUTHORIZATION
4.1 Before a report is ordered, the candidate receives a clear written
disclosure, in a document that consists only of that disclosure,
that a consumer report may be obtained for employment purposes,
and signs a written authorization.
4.2 [The disclosure states clearly that reports may also be obtained
during employment.] (Delete if you will not recheck employees.)
4.3 State and local notices are provided as separate documents.
4.4 [HR / the screening company] keeps the signed authorization.
5. REVIEW AND ADJUDICATION
5.1 Reports go only to [adjudicator role]. Interviewers and the hiring
manager see the outcome, not the report.
5.2 The adjudicator applies the criteria in Appendix C, considering
the nature and gravity of the offense or conduct, the time since
the offense, conduct or end of sentence, and the duties of the job.
5.3 An arrest that did not lead to a conviction is not used to
exclude anyone. [Pending charges are considered only where the
alleged conduct relates to the duties of the job.]
5.4 No one is excluded automatically for having a criminal record.
6. PRE-ADVERSE AND ADVERSE ACTION
6.1 Before any decision based in whole or in part on a report, the
candidate receives a copy of the report, "A Summary of Your Rights
Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act", any required state or local
notice, and [at least 5 business days] to respond.
6.2 The adjudicator reviews any response, records an individualized
assessment, and decides. [Decisions are approved by: role.]
6.3 If the decision stands, the candidate receives an adverse action
notice naming the screening company, stating that it did not make
the decision, and stating the right to a free copy of the report
within 60 days and to dispute it with the screening company.
6.4 A withdrawal for a reason unrelated to the report is recorded as
that reason, with no adverse action notice.
7. CURRENT EMPLOYEES
7.1 Employees in the role families marked in Appendix A are rechecked
[every [x] months / on transfer into a covered role / at license
renewal]. Rechecks follow sections 4 to 6.
7.2 [Employees in roles marked in Appendix A report [a conviction /
loss of license] to [role] within [x] days.]
8. STAFFING AND CLIENT PLACEMENTS (agencies only)
8.1 Each client agreement states who orders the report, who
adjudicates and who sends each notice.
9. CONFIDENTIALITY, RETENTION AND DISPOSAL
9.1 Reports are stored in [system], with access limited to [roles].
They are not copied into ATS notes, chat or email.
9.2 Reports and notices are kept for [period, at least one year from
the decision], and longer while a charge, claim or audit is open.
9.3 At the end of that period, paper is shredded and electronic copies
deleted so they cannot be read or reconstructed.
10. TRAINING AND REVIEW
10.1 Adjudicators are trained on this policy and on fair chance rules
before reviewing any report, and [yearly].
10.2 [Owner] reviews this policy every [12] months and whenever a law
where we hire changes.
APPENDIX A: Role families, checks and rechecks
APPENDIX B: Jurisdiction rules (timing, notices, waiting periods)
APPENDIX C: Adjudication criteria by role family
Appendix A, filled in as an example
These rows are an example of the format, not a recommendation for your roles.
| Role family | Checks | Rechecks |
|---|---|---|
| All roles | Criminal conviction search where the candidate lived and worked in the last [7] years | None |
| Drivers | All-roles checks plus motor vehicle record; see motor vehicle record checks | [Annual] driving record review |
| Finance roles handling funds | All-roles checks plus credit report where state and local law allow; see credit check laws | On transfer into the role |
| Licensed clinical roles | All-roles checks plus license verification with the issuing board | At license renewal |
| Senior leadership | All-roles checks plus education and employment verification | None |
Which law does each clause answer to?
| Clause | Source | What it requires |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(b)(2)(A) | A clear and conspicuous written disclosure "in a document that consists solely of the disclosure", and the candidate's written authorization, before the report is procured |
| 4.1, 9 | § 1681b(b)(1) | You certify to the screening company that you made the disclosure, will follow the adverse action steps, and will not use the report in violation of equal employment law |
| 4.2, 7 | FTC and EEOC joint guidance | An authorization can cover the whole period of employment, but only if you say so clearly and conspicuously |
| 5.2 to 5.4 | EEOC enforcement guidance, April 25, 2012 | Screen on the nature and gravity of the offense, the time elapsed and the nature of the job; an exclusion based on an arrest, in itself, is not job related; individualized assessment gives the person a chance to show the exclusion should not apply |
| 6.1 | § 1681b(b)(3)(A); CFPB Regulation V, Appendix K | Copy of the report and the summary of rights before adverse action; use the current CFPB form your screening company supplies |
| 6.3 | 15 U.S.C. § 1681m(a) | Notice of adverse action, the screening company's contact details, that it did not make the decision, and the 60-day free copy and dispute rights |
| Appendix A | 15 U.S.C. § 1681c | Screening companies generally may not report arrests and most other adverse items older than seven years; convictions are not limited federally, and the limits do not apply to jobs that pay, or may reasonably be expected to pay, $75,000 a year or more |
| 9.2 | 29 C.F.R. § 1602.14 | Keep personnel records for one year from the record or the personnel action, whichever is later, and until any charge or lawsuit is finally resolved |
| 9.3 | 16 C.F.R. § 682.3 (FTC Disposal Rule) | Reasonable measures when disposing of consumer report information, such as shredding paper so it cannot practicably be read or reconstructed |
Check your state before you adopt this. Appendix B is where state and city law goes, and it often changes clauses 3, 5 and 6.
- Criminal history timing and assessment: fair chance pages for California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, DC, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
- Credit reports: state and city credit check laws.
- Everything else at hire: the state hiring checklists, for example Texas, New York, Illinois and Colorado.
One example of how much a state can change: California's Fair Chance Act generally bars employers with five or more employees from asking about conviction history before a conditional offer and requires an individualized assessment and written notices before a final decision, according to the state Civil Rights Department. If you want a separate, candidate-facing statement of your approach to records, pair this policy with a fair chance hiring policy.
How do you use this template?
- List your role families and, for each, the duties that create a real risk: driving, handling money, access to patients, children or customer homes. If no duty justifies a check, leave it out.
- Fill in Appendix A from that list, then ask your screening company to set up one package per role family so a recruiter cannot order the wrong one.
- Write Appendix C: for each role family, which kinds of conduct are relevant and for how long. "Theft-related convictions in the last [x] years are relevant to cash-handling roles" is a criterion; "any felony" is a blanket ban.
- Fill in Appendix B for every state and city where you hire, from your counsel and your screening company's state forms.
- Name one adjudicator and a backup, train them, and remove report access from everyone else.
- Update the offer letter and the candidate emails so they match clauses 3.3 and 6.
How should adjudication work without becoming a blanket ban?
The EEOC's guidance draws the line between targeted screening and blanket exclusions. Its three factors, often called the Green factors, are the nature and gravity of the offense or conduct, the time that has passed since the offense, conduct or completion of the sentence, and the nature of the job held or sought. Its recommended practices include eliminating policies that exclude people based on any criminal record, limiting inquiries to records where exclusion would be job related, keeping criminal record information confidential, and training the people who decide.
The individualized assessment in clause 6.2 is the practical safeguard. The candidate is told they may be excluded, gets a chance to show the exclusion should not apply (wrong person, dismissed charge, evidence of rehabilitation, time since the conduct), and the adjudicator writes down what they considered. That note is what you will rely on if the decision is questioned. Interviewers stay out of it: see ban-the-box interview questions for what they may and may not ask.
Can you recheck current employees?
Yes, with two conditions. The authorization has to cover it: the FTC and EEOC guidance says an authorization can last for the whole period of employment only if the disclosure says so clearly and conspicuously, which is why clause 4.2 exists. And every decision based on a new report goes through the same pre-adverse and adverse action steps as a hire. Keep rechecks to roles where the risk continues, and tell employees in advance which roles are rechecked and how often, so the recheck is a known part of the job rather than a surprise.
What mistakes make a background check policy fail?
- Checks that do not match the job. A credit report for a role with no access to money adds legal risk where state or city law restricts credit checks, and tells you nothing useful.
- Interviewers who see the report. Once a hiring manager has read it, you cannot show the decision was made on the criteria alone.
- Extra terms in the disclosure. Liability waivers and at-will statements do not belong in the stand-alone document.
- No written assessment. A decision without a record of what was weighed is hard to defend.
- Reports kept forever. Set the retention period, then destroy reports securely. See the candidate data retention policy for the wider schedule.
If you also test for drugs, keep that in its own document with its own consent: see the drug testing policy template. For UK hires, criminal record checks run through a different system; see DBS checks for employers.
Questions people ask
What should a company background check policy include?
It should list which checks apply to which role families, when checks start (usually after a conditional offer), how candidates receive the FCRA disclosure and give written authorization, who reviews reports and against what criteria, the pre-adverse and adverse action steps, whether current employees are rechecked, and how reports are stored and destroyed.
Does an employer need a written background check policy?
Federal law does not require one, but the EEOC's 2012 guidance on arrest and conviction records recommends a narrowly tailored written policy for screening criminal records, and a written policy is what lets you show that every candidate for a role was checked and assessed the same way. Some state and city fair chance laws also require specific written notices that a policy should name.
Can one background check authorization cover rechecks during employment?
Yes, if it says so. The FTC and EEOC's joint employer guidance says an authorization can cover the whole period of employment, but only if the disclosure makes that clear and conspicuous. The pre-adverse and adverse action steps still apply each time you act on a new report.
Can an employer reject a candidate because of an arrest record?
Not on the arrest alone. The EEOC's guidance says an arrest does not establish that criminal conduct occurred and that excluding someone based on an arrest, in itself, is not job related and consistent with business necessity. An employer may look at the underlying conduct if it is relevant to the job, and some state and city laws, such as California's Fair Chance Act, restrict the use of arrests further.